Tuesday, 24 January 2012

The Problem With Skinny Bashing

Published on January 20, 2012 by GirlieGirlArmy  

Calling All Women: Let’s Stop Body Bashing and Widen Society’s View of What is Beautiful!


Full figured women have long been under assault. They aren’t represented on television, in movies or in print. And if they are, they aren’t the heroine or the love interest. They are the friend. If the media were to be believed, the average woman would be a size 2, white, straight, and carry a $3000 handbag.
The desire to push back against that vision of what society says is the ideal body type is natural. And it should be challenged. Lately, I’ve been seeing images accompanied by text on facebook that seek to elevate the status of women with curves. They look back to the period of Marilyn Monroe to show that thin, or very thin, wasn’t always in. And that’s wonderful. Celebrate healthy bodies of all shapes and sizes. Sing it loud and proud. But, this particular image which I’m linking to because copyright precludes me from posting it, while trying to rage against what society says is beautiful, is truly an example of what is wrong with society. It shows our lack of a way to discuss our bodies without judgment and without competition.
When I look at this image, I see two beautiful women. Marilyn, of course, was the biggest sex symbol of her time and is undoubtedly lovely. But the woman on the right, the woman who this image seems to despise, is not sickly. In fact, if you look at her legs, you’ll find muscle.  If you look at her stomach, you won’t see ribs poking out. You’ll see a toned abdomen. It’s true that she’s thin. That she fits the size 2 image of woman that is unfairly represented in media as the only desirable figure. But to say that the woman on the right is less attractive simply to advance another body type? That’s not right either. Demonizing one to glorify another isn’t the way to have a real discussion on the female body. In fact, it’s part of the problem.
The real question is, why must it be one way or the other? Shouldn’t we all be striving for healthy bodies? And that means a different shape for every woman. The media has us all chasing our own tails in the search of the perfect figure. No matter where you look, you’ll find a reason to believe that your body can never reach perfection. The idea that perfection actually exists is the real myth.
It’s obvious that we have an issue with weight in this country. As a teacher, I’ve met ten year old girls without an ounce of fat who are dieting. They hate gaining weight even though they are getting taller and growing up. That’s unhealthy. We also have a nationwide obesity epidemic that’s putting our children at risk for diseases like type 2 diabetes. That’s also unhealthy.
The sad thing is, I’m not seeing this image posted on men’s profiles. I’m seeing it posted by women and commented on by women. They are relishing in the comparison between Marilyn and the woman on the beach. They are loving this moment of hate towards the woman in the bikini. It’s true that women who don’t conform to the narrow vision of beauty seen on TV are ostracized. They are angry for being given less importance and less of a voice in society than size 2’s, and they should be angry.  However, why does this anger automatically turn into criticism of the other body type? Shouldn’t we as women be banding together to insist that a larger group of women be represented? Shouldn’t we be taking the fight to the media who is largely responsible for only showing one type of body? One woman, after noting that she’s the same size as Marilyn was, wrote, “So IN YOUR FACE all you haters who think women need to look like stick bugs to be attractive.” Why must this woman verbally assault the size 2’s and call them stick bugs to make a place for the size 12’s? Isn’t there a place for all of us?
What should be attractive? How about healthy bodies. Whether they come in the form of a size 2 or a size 12, a well loved and cared for physique is what we as women should be striving for. By all means, challenge the idea that obtaining runway model size isn’t the only way to be beautiful. Demand that the full range of woman be represented in film and in print. But tearing someone else down to demonstrate your point does a disservice to all women. It’s time to celebrate our differences. To realize that there is no one correct image of beauty. To do away with notions of perfection and instead, enjoy life as healthy confident women. It’s no easy task, but with a little love and self-acceptance, I think we can do it.

Thursday, 19 January 2012

Valentines Treat...

For curvy girls the best and prettiest underwear, ialways think, is made by Freya. And the very best this valentines day is the Lyla range…..

Girls AND  boys…. enjoy <3

Body Ideals?

4 problems with the fetishization of Christina Hendricks body

One of my favourite bloggers, Ashe Mischief, wrote a post today entitiled 9 Things Christina Hendricks Taught Me About Body Love & Confidence. I think it’s fabulous that a lot of women are embracing their curvy silhouettes as a result of the Mad Men actress being unapologetic about her own. I still have issues, however, with the media’s constant focus on women’s bodies, whatever the type. I am a proponent of diversity in fashion be it size, race, age or ability, but many are now holding Christina Hendricks up as an “ideal” and I have big problems with that. Here are four reasons why:
1. I’m not curvy!
A flat-chested, narrow-hipped girl like me feels decidedly inadequate and less womanly around someone with such generous assets. Ashe’s post mentions that Christina’s husband loves her breasts…what man doesn’t love breasts? They all seem to, which sucks for those of us who don’t really have them! Having a Marilyn Monroe figure has never been a detriment. As far as I can tell it has always been considered the most sexy and desireable figure type. Unfortunately, if I were to gain weight it wouldn’t magically go to my boobs and hips.
2. Promoting a curvier ideal does not promote diversity.
Anytime we idealize one body type over another somebody suffers. It seems that Ms. Hendricks, through no fault or desire of her own, has single-handedly swung the pendulum so that now runways are filled with cleavage, and boobs are apparently de rigeur. (Were they ever “out”?) Once again, sucks for those of us who don’t have ‘em.
No, I wouldn't like to lose 10 pounds...
3. Fetishizing Christina’s body is objectification.
In a post which was derived from the answer to a college essay question, one blogger asked “When will we stop treating women’s bodies like the latest trench coat?” In other words, let’s stop fetishizing, judging, analyzing women’s bodies, deciding which type is in or out, and value women for all our stellar qualities.
4. It’s still about what boys like.
A major aspect of the current Christina Hendricks fixation is a focus on what men prefer. A common danger in fashion is women playing up to men’s desires. I keep hearing people say how great it is that men think Christina Hendricks is hot. Women, stop using what men like as a yardstick for your own worth! It doesn’t matter what men like. What do you like? I’m sure Christina Hendricks is a wonderful person with many talents. Unfortunately, I wouldn’t know because all I hear about is her body.

Wednesday, 18 January 2012

Iris Apfel x M·A·C

The beauty brand collaborates with the celebrated starlet for their new collection made up of dramatic colours and bird inspirations


Of all the inspired collaborations MAC Cosmetics have put out recently (Gareth Pugh, Daphne Guinness), their latest foray with the celebrated ‘geriatric starlet’, Iris Apfel seems like another bolt of fashion alchemy. Ever since the Metropolitan Museum put on “Rara Avis: Selections from the Iris Barrel Apfel Collection”- a display of her wildly idiosyncratic and eccentric wardrobe at the Costume Institute in 2005, Apfel has enjoyed a late career renaissance (that has included designing jewellery with Alexis Bittar and being photographed by Bruce Weber for Italian Vogue) where most other nonagenarians would be more accustomed to taking it easy.
Her bird-inspired collection for MAC features an eyelash curler called Opulash (emulating her signature bouffant lashes) dramatic eyeshadows and traffic stopping bold lipsticks with names like Party Parrot and Pink Pigeon. For Apfel, even at 90 years old, she still makes that special effort: “Even if I don’t do anything else, I just use a lipstick – my mouth isn’t that big so it doesn’t take too long to slap it on.”
Dazed Digital: What are your first memories of makeup and its power to transform?
Iris Apfel: I guess when I was 17-18. A friend of mine had a very glamorous sister who was a fashion model. She took a look at me and said, “Oh you have beautiful eyes and you don’t do anything with that. Come with me.” so we went over to their place and she took out a tube of mustache wax. She took a bit of the wax out and lit a flame under it and it melted and she layered it and layered it over my eyelashes and it really looked great. My eyelashes looked like Miss Piggy’s – very long and very full. I adopted that and I used to wear very heavy eye makeup and a very red mouth. It was very transformative.
DD: When did you first start collaborating with MAC? What appeals to you about working with MAC?
Iris Apfel: They were very kind. If I’m not mistaken I was recommended by Kim Hastreiter of Paper magazine. They called and asked if I was interested in doing something. I thought it was wonderful and I love doing creative things and I’d never done a makeup range before so it was quite fun.
DD: Tell us about how you developed the range?
Iris Apfel: They asked me what colours I liked. I explained that I don’t like a sheer lipstick – I like it heavy and matte. So they worked on the texture. I’m happy with the result – the colours are very clear and bright and bird-like. For I am the rare bird!
DD: You are being filmed for a documentary (by the Maysles brothers), shot a campaign for Coach and collaborated on a line of jewellery and clothes for HSN and now this MAC collab – how do you find the energy for it all?
Iris Apfel: I don’t know – I find it and I go go go and when I stop, I fall apart and I need to reassemble! When I’m doing it, I just love it.
DD: Rara Avis was the first exhibition at the Met devoted to the collection of a fashion enthusiast as opposed to designer. How did the exhibition at the Met change your life and how you were perceived by the fashion world?
Iris Apfel: It made me a geriatric starlet! I was always photographed when I went out but I never went out that much and I wasn’t much of a socialite. I just dressed because I enjoyed it and my husband enjoyed it. I’ve been buying interesting clothes all my life. The show never started out being a fashion show – it started out being a show about accessories. But (curator) Harold Koda came round and asked me to spare some outfits to show the accessories in the context. It started the whole Pandora’s box – they looked through my armoires and wardrobes. In the end it was all the galleries at the Costume Institute and 80-odd mannequins!
DD: Your look mixes high and street, ethnic influences and lots of costume jewellery and is always topped off by your signature glasses – did it take a lot of experimenting to arrive at the look or did it happen organically over the years?
Iris Apfel: Well it was a combination actually. I don’t do these things intellectually – I just feel it. It took a while to bring it to fruition and it was a bit of evolution and trial and error. I used to have to work at it and now I don’t. First you have to know who you are and then it becomes much easier to express yourself.
DD: What’s your advice to getting older gracefully?
Iris Apfel: Well just be yourself. I think Chanel said, “Nothing makes a woman look old that a woman trying to look young.” Dress appropriately and do your makeup appropriately and be yourself  and you can look very chic. You can look beautiful at any age.

Size Sexy Loves....

The New Chanel Ad..... Purrrrr

Random Acts: Rankin's Rachael


A new film directed by Rankin airs tonight as part of Channel 4’s Random Acts series.

Rankin’s contribution, entitled ‘Rachael’, stars Holliday Grainger and Suki Alice Waterhouse, along with Shaun Dooley.
Set in 1940’s Britain, a post war family go about the everyday business but a darker side to the otherwise innocent seeming Rachael unravels.

Directed by Rankin, it airs tonight on Channel 4 and is not to be missed! We all know what Rankin can do with a camera in his hand!!